FLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graco has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 23.54%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat Graco's return on equity of 20.86%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $68.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.44%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $90.38 which suggests that it could grow by 6.75%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.832, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.785%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Graco offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $519.2M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is lower than Graco's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.76x while Graco's PE ratio is 29.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.69x versus 6.84x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IDEX has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 14.92%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat IDEX's return on equity of 13.61%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $68.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.44%. On the other hand IDEX has an analysts' consensus of $240.77 which suggests that it could grow by 11.65%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than IDEX, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than IDEX.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IDEX has a beta of 0.961, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.95%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. IDEX offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. IDEX pays out 31.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than IDEX quarterly revenues of $798.2M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is lower than IDEX's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.76x while IDEX's PE ratio is 32.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.69x versus 5.01x for IDEX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of -161.83%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $68.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.44%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.76x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.69x versus 3.64x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker Hannifin has a net margin of 5.15% compared to Flowserve's net margin of 14.24%. Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73%.

Flowserve has a consensus price target of $68.80, signalling upside risk potential of 18.44%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $741.41 which suggests that it could grow by 14.83%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Flowserve has a beta of 1.414, which suggesting that the stock is 41.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.595%.

Flowserve has a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.43%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Flowserve pays 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Flowserve quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Flowserve's net income of $58.4M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M. Notably, Flowserve's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.76x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 29.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowserve is 1.69x versus 4.22x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.