GGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crane has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of 12.94%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat Crane's return on equity of 18.51%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.38, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.55%. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Crane offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 22.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are smaller than Crane quarterly revenues of $597.2M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than Crane's net income of $77.3M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.95x while Crane's PE ratio is 34.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.85x versus 3.98x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowserve has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of 5.15%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.38, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $68.80 which suggests that it could grow by 17.71%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.414, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.437%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $58.4M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.95x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 28.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.85x versus 1.70x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of -161.83%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.38, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Graco has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Graco is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Graco has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.95x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.85x versus 3.58x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 23.54% compared to Graco's net margin of 0.25%. Graco's return on equity of 20.86% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.38, signalling upside risk potential of 6.64%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 311.83%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.832, which suggesting that the stock is 16.785% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 31.26% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $519.2M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Graco's net income of $122.2M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.95x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.85x versus 0.18x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.