SHLRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geberit AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 47.19%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.874%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 68.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is higher than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 28.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 5.60x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of 5%. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 37.22%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.365%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 116.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kuehne + Nagel International AG's is not.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $374.7M. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 21.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 1.02x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Komax Holding AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41%.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Komax Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Komax Holding AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Komax Holding AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.129%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Komax Holding AG offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG pays out 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is higher than Komax Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Komax Holding AG's PE ratio is 98.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 0.83x for Komax Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGS AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.

Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.

Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.958%.

Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is higher than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 2.73x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.