KMAAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 47.19%.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.874%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 68.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 28.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 5.60x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 5%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 37.22%.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.365%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 116.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kuehne + Nagel International AG's is not.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $374.7M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 21.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 1.02x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SGS AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.958%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 2.73x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 9.11%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13%.

Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.04%.

Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 2.47x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.