SGSOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of --. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 47.19%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.874%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 68.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 28.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.73x versus 5.60x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 5%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 37.22%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.365%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 116.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.5B. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $374.7M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 21.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.73x versus 1.02x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Komax Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of --. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Komax Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Komax Holding AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Komax Holding AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.129%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Komax Holding AG offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG pays out 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Komax Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Komax Holding AG's PE ratio is 98.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.73x versus 0.83x for Komax Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to SGS AG's net margin of 9.11%. SGS AG's return on equity of -- beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13%.

SGS AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SGS AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe SGS AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, which suggesting that the stock is 28.958% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.04%.

SGS AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.46%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share. SGS AG pays 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

SGS AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.2B. SGS AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M. Notably, SGS AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SGS AG is 2.73x versus 2.47x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.