ZETA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DoubleVerify Holdings has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 12.28%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 130.11%. On the other hand DoubleVerify Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.92 which suggests that it could grow by 49.54%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DoubleVerify Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DoubleVerify Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues of $190.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is lower than DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DoubleVerify Holdings's PE ratio is 45.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.79x versus 3.72x for DoubleVerify Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flywire has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -13.53%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat Flywire's return on equity of 0.36%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 130.11%. On the other hand Flywire has an analysts' consensus of $15.58 which suggests that it could grow by 56.62%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than Flywire, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than Flywire.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flywire has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flywire offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flywire pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than Flywire quarterly revenues of $117.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is higher than Flywire's net income of -$15.9M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flywire's PE ratio is 995.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.79x versus 2.56x for Flywire. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HubSpot has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of 0.71%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 130.11%. On the other hand HubSpot has an analysts' consensus of $849.73 which suggests that it could grow by 43.19%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.361%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HubSpot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HubSpot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are smaller than HubSpot quarterly revenues of $703.2M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is higher than HubSpot's net income of $5M. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HubSpot's PE ratio is 6,593.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.79x versus 11.77x for HubSpot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Zeta Global Holdings's net margin of -1.23%. Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.77, signalling upside risk potential of 130.11%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 80.56%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than WidePoint.

Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.803, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.295%.

Zeta Global Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Zeta Global Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues are $314.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, Zeta Global Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Zeta Global Holdings is 2.79x versus 0.25x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.