HUBS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fiserv has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 17.86%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Fiserv's return on equity of 10.79%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $858.47, signalling upside risk potential of 43.5%. On the other hand Fiserv has an analysts' consensus of $254.45 which suggests that it could grow by 14.73%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Fiserv, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Fiserv.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fiserv has a beta of 0.926, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.435%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fiserv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fiserv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Fiserv quarterly revenues of $5.3B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Fiserv's net income of $938M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,646.89x while Fiserv's PE ratio is 41.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.87x versus 6.31x for Fiserv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -11.26%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -8.61%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $858.47, signalling upside risk potential of 43.5%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $21.41 which suggests that it could grow by 40.04%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Freshworks, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Freshworks.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $194.6M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$21.9M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,646.89x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.87x versus 6.38x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of -1.04%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Twilio's return on equity of -1.24%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $858.47, signalling upside risk potential of 43.5%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $142.95 which suggests that it could grow by 38.78%. Given that HubSpot has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe HubSpot is more attractive than Twilio.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.083%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.2B. HubSpot's net income of $5M is higher than Twilio's net income of -$12.5M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,646.89x while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.87x versus 3.83x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 0.71% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 4.84%. HubSpot's return on equity of 0.29% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04%.

HubSpot has a consensus price target of $858.47, signalling upside risk potential of 43.5%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $34.77 which suggests that it could grow by 148.71%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than HubSpot, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than HubSpot.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.804, which suggesting that the stock is 80.361% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

HubSpot has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HubSpot pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

HubSpot quarterly revenues are $703.2M, which are larger than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $314.7M. HubSpot's net income of $5M is lower than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M. Notably, HubSpot's price-to-earnings ratio is 6,646.89x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HubSpot is 11.87x versus 2.58x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.