DV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intellinetics has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -1.26%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -5.34%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.61, signalling upside risk potential of 54.12%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.1%. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than Intellinetics.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.627, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.332%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.3M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is higher than Intellinetics's net income of -$53.7K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.56x versus 2.98x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RingCentral has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -1.17%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat RingCentral's return on equity of --.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.61, signalling upside risk potential of 54.12%. On the other hand RingCentral has an analysts' consensus of $37.78 which suggests that it could grow by 52.58%. Given that DoubleVerify Holdings has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe DoubleVerify Holdings is more attractive than RingCentral.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RingCentral has a beta of 1.301, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.131%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RingCentral offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RingCentral pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are smaller than RingCentral quarterly revenues of $614.5M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is higher than RingCentral's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while RingCentral's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.56x versus 0.95x for RingCentral. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of -1.23%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.61, signalling upside risk potential of 54.12%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $6.50 which suggests that it could grow by 95.2%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.832, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.194%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.56x versus 0.23x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zeta Global Holdings has a net margin of 12.28% compared to DoubleVerify Holdings's net margin of 4.84%. DoubleVerify Holdings's return on equity of 5.12% beat Zeta Global Holdings's return on equity of -20.04%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.61, signalling upside risk potential of 54.12%. On the other hand Zeta Global Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $34.77 which suggests that it could grow by 156.41%. Given that Zeta Global Holdings has higher upside potential than DoubleVerify Holdings, analysts believe Zeta Global Holdings is more attractive than DoubleVerify Holdings.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zeta Global Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DoubleVerify Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zeta Global Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DoubleVerify Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zeta Global Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DoubleVerify Holdings quarterly revenues are $190.6M, which are smaller than Zeta Global Holdings quarterly revenues of $314.7M. DoubleVerify Holdings's net income of $23.4M is higher than Zeta Global Holdings's net income of $15.2M. Notably, DoubleVerify Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.13x while Zeta Global Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DoubleVerify Holdings is 3.56x versus 2.51x for Zeta Global Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.