RNG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Amdocs has a net margin of -1.29% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 6.84%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Amdocs's return on equity of 13.85%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $43.37, signalling upside risk potential of 17.24%. On the other hand Amdocs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.56%. Given that Amdocs has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe Amdocs is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amdocs has a beta of 0.717, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.33%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amdocs offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amdocs pays out 42.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Amdocs's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $608.8M, which are smaller than Amdocs quarterly revenues of $1.3B. RingCentral's net income of -$7.9M is lower than Amdocs's net income of $86.4M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amdocs's PE ratio is 20.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 1.46x versus 1.98x for Amdocs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paymentus Holdings has a net margin of -1.29% compared to RingCentral's net margin of 6.23%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Paymentus Holdings's return on equity of 9.16%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $43.37, signalling upside risk potential of 17.24%. On the other hand Paymentus Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.10 which suggests that it could fall by -1.89%. Given that RingCentral has higher upside potential than Paymentus Holdings, analysts believe RingCentral is more attractive than Paymentus Holdings.

RingCentral has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paymentus Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paymentus Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paymentus Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $608.8M, which are larger than Paymentus Holdings quarterly revenues of $231.6M. RingCentral's net income of -$7.9M is lower than Paymentus Holdings's net income of $14.4M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paymentus Holdings's PE ratio is 105.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 1.46x versus 5.54x for Paymentus Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twilio has a net margin of -1.29% compared to RingCentral's net margin of -0.86%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat Twilio's return on equity of -5.02%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $43.37, signalling upside risk potential of 17.24%. On the other hand Twilio has an analysts' consensus of $94.06 which suggests that it could fall by -15.55%. Given that RingCentral has higher upside potential than Twilio, analysts believe RingCentral is more attractive than Twilio.

RingCentral has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twilio has a beta of 1.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.246%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twilio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twilio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $608.8M, which are smaller than Twilio quarterly revenues of $1.1B. RingCentral's net income of -$7.9M is higher than Twilio's net income of -$9.7M. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Twilio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 1.46x versus 4.44x for Twilio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -1.29% compared to RingCentral's net margin of -1.23%. RingCentral's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -20.12%.

RingCentral has a consensus price target of $43.37, signalling upside risk potential of 17.24%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 46.4%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than RingCentral, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than RingCentral.

RingCentral has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.329% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.645%.

RingCentral has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. RingCentral pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

RingCentral quarterly revenues are $608.8M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.6M. RingCentral's net income of -$7.9M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$425.2K. Notably, RingCentral's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RingCentral is 1.46x versus 0.31x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.