TRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 6.31%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 11.9%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $68.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.4%. Given that Greenbrier Companies has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Greenbrier Companies is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.752%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $875.9M. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $55.3M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 9.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.81x versus 0.48x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FreightCar America has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 25.15%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat FreightCar America's return on equity of --.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand FreightCar America has an analysts' consensus of $14.25 which suggests that it could grow by 107.42%. Given that FreightCar America has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe FreightCar America is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FreightCar America has a beta of 2.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.994%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. FreightCar America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. FreightCar America pays out -36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are larger than FreightCar America quarterly revenues of $137.7M. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than FreightCar America's net income of $34.6M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while FreightCar America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.81x versus 0.38x for FreightCar America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REV Group has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 3.47%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat REV Group's return on equity of 21.81%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand REV Group has an analysts' consensus of $34.88 which suggests that it could grow by 4.64%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than REV Group.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REV Group has a beta of 1.568, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.837%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. REV Group offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group pays out 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are larger than REV Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is higher than REV Group's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while REV Group's PE ratio is 18.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.81x versus 0.76x for REV Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 4.59% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 8.21%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.69% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.16%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, signalling upside risk potential of 19.97%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $215.12 which suggests that it could grow by 16.42%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.505, which suggesting that the stock is 50.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.649%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $629.4M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Trinity Industries's net income of $28.9M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $212M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.04x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 30.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.81x versus 3.11x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.