KLG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Archer-Daniels Midland has a net margin of -1.6% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 0.09%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 23.21% beat Archer-Daniels Midland's return on equity of 7.6%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $19.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.67%. On the other hand Archer-Daniels Midland has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.33%. Given that Archer-Daniels Midland has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Archer-Daniels Midland is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Archer-Daniels Midland has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.225%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Archer-Daniels Midland offers a yield of 3.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. WK Kellogg pays 615.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland pays out 28.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Archer-Daniels Midland's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WK Kellogg's is not.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Archer-Daniels Midland quarterly revenues of $19.9B. WK Kellogg's net income of -$11M is lower than Archer-Daniels Midland's net income of $18M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Archer-Daniels Midland's PE ratio is 14.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.58x versus 0.29x for Archer-Daniels Midland. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kellanova has a net margin of -1.6% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 11.35%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 23.21% beat Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $19.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.67%. On the other hand Kellanova has an analysts' consensus of $60.05 which suggests that it could grow by 0.24%. Given that WK Kellogg has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe WK Kellogg is more attractive than Kellanova.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kellanova has a beta of 0.381, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.868%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Kellanova offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. WK Kellogg pays 615.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova pays out 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WK Kellogg's is not.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Kellanova quarterly revenues of $3.2B. WK Kellogg's net income of -$11M is lower than Kellanova's net income of $367M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Kellanova's PE ratio is 27.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.58x versus 2.18x for Kellanova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of -1.6% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of --. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 23.21% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $19.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.67%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WK Kellogg has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe WK Kellogg is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. WK Kellogg pays 615.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $689M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. WK Kellogg's net income of -$11M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.58x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -1.6% compared to WK Kellogg's net margin of 3.7%. WK Kellogg's return on equity of 23.21% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

WK Kellogg has a consensus price target of $19.20, signalling upside risk potential of 5.67%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.79%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than WK Kellogg, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than WK Kellogg.

WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

WK Kellogg has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. WK Kellogg pays 615.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WK Kellogg's is not.

WK Kellogg quarterly revenues are $689M, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. WK Kellogg's net income of -$11M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, WK Kellogg's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.29x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WK Kellogg is 0.58x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.