K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Mills has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 12.92%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat General Mills's return on equity of 26.75%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.38%. On the other hand General Mills has an analysts' consensus of $62.53 which suggests that it could grow by 10.73%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Mills has a beta of 0.150, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.046%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. General Mills offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills pays out 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than General Mills quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is lower than General Mills's net income of $625.6M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.26x while General Mills's PE ratio is 12.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.24x versus 1.62x for General Mills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of -0.81%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat The Honest's return on equity of -4.47%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.38%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.42 which suggests that it could grow by 67.8%. Given that The Honest has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe The Honest is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.8M. Kellanova's net income of $365M is higher than The Honest's net income of -$810K. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.26x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.24x versus 1.18x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 9.07%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.38%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $144.99 which suggests that it could grow by 3.79%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.423%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.26x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.24x versus 2.35x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Newell Brands has a net margin of 11.68% compared to Kellanova's net margin of -2.77%. Kellanova's return on equity of 37.91% beat Newell Brands's return on equity of -7.26%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $83.43, signalling upside risk potential of 1.38%. On the other hand Newell Brands has an analysts' consensus of $8.83 which suggests that it could grow by 90.61%. Given that Newell Brands has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Newell Brands is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.742% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Newell Brands has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.609%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Newell Brands offers a yield of 6.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Kellanova pays 57.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Newell Brands pays out -54.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Newell Brands quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Kellanova's net income of $365M is higher than Newell Brands's net income of -$54M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.26x while Newell Brands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.24x versus 0.25x for Newell Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.