SPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of -5.1%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 7.13%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.75%. On the other hand Central Garden & Pet has an analysts' consensus of $42.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.06%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Central Garden & Pet, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Central Garden & Pet.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, which suggesting that the stock is 19.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.806, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.446%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Central Garden & Pet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Garden & Pet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $773.7M, which are larger than Central Garden & Pet quarterly revenues of $669.5M. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M is higher than Central Garden & Pet's net income of -$34.2M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.77x while Central Garden & Pet's PE ratio is 24.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.87x versus 0.82x for Central Garden & Pet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of -4.97%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.75%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $105.96 which suggests that it could grow by 0.5%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, which suggesting that the stock is 19.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.585%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $773.7M, which are smaller than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.77x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 47.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.87x versus 4.29x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 5.62%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Clorox's return on equity of 135.23%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.75%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.46 which suggests that it could grow by 0.84%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Clorox.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, which suggesting that the stock is 19.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.102%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. Clorox offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $773.7M, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M is lower than Clorox's net income of $99M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.77x while Clorox's PE ratio is 56.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.87x versus 2.72x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 3.7% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 23.75%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, which suggesting that the stock is 19.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.04%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $773.7M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.77x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.87x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.