CLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Clorox's net margin of -4.97%. Clorox's return on equity of 135.23% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.46, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $105.96 which suggests that it could grow by 0.5%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Clorox has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.102% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.574, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.585%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Clorox's net income of $99M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 47.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.72x versus 4.29x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Clorox's net margin of 14.64%. Clorox's return on equity of 135.23% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 434.96%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.46, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $104.73 which suggests that it could grow by 13.95%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Clorox.

Clorox has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.102% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.425, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.48%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 76.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $5B. Clorox's net income of $99M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $737M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.72x versus 3.77x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Clorox's net margin of 9.27%. Clorox's return on equity of 135.23% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.46, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.46%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than Clorox.

Clorox has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.102% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.056%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Clorox's net income of $99M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 21.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.72x versus 2.22x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 5.62% compared to Clorox's net margin of 18.21%. Clorox's return on equity of 135.23% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 28.65%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.46, signalling upside risk potential of 0.84%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Clorox.

Clorox has a beta of 0.419, which suggesting that the stock is 58.102% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.862%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.97%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.7B. Clorox's net income of $99M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4B. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 28.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.72x versus 4.95x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.