TSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 11.45%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.58%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $163.74 which suggests that it could grow by 10.71%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Tyson Foods, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Tyson Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.802%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while Clorox's PE ratio is 40.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.42x versus 2.57x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hormel Foods has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 5.71%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.58%. On the other hand Hormel Foods has an analysts' consensus of $31.43 which suggests that it could grow by 2.25%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.315, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.513%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Hormel Foods offers a yield of 3.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than Hormel Foods quarterly revenues of $3B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while Hormel Foods's PE ratio is 22.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.42x versus 1.42x for Hormel Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 5.4%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 28.51%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.58%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $49.29 which suggests that it could fall by -12.4%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.632, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.831%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $235.9M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.42x versus 0.75x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of -0.04%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.27, signalling upside risk potential of 6.58%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.54%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Tyson Foods, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Tyson Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.625, which suggesting that the stock is 37.538% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.32x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.42x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.