IONQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Quantum has a net margin of -423.36% compared to IonQ's net margin of -19.2%. IonQ's return on equity of -36.31% beat Quantum's return on equity of --.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.96%. On the other hand Quantum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -89.02%. Given that Quantum has more downside risk than IonQ, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum has a beta of 3.580, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 257.987%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are smaller than Quantum quarterly revenues of $70.5M. IonQ's net income of -$52.5M is lower than Quantum's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 248.79x versus 0.76x for Quantum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of -423.36% compared to IonQ's net margin of -5618.81%. IonQ's return on equity of -36.31% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity of -32.92%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.96%. On the other hand Quantum Computing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -51.71%. Given that Quantum Computing has more downside risk than IonQ, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Quantum Computing.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 211.365%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing pays out -3.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are larger than Quantum Computing quarterly revenues of $101K. IonQ's net income of -$52.5M is lower than Quantum Computing's net income of -$5.7M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 248.79x versus 3,901.80x for Quantum Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -423.36% compared to IonQ's net margin of -623.76%. IonQ's return on equity of -36.31% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -51.99%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.96%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $3.50 which suggests that it could fall by -62.84%. Given that Rigetti Computing has more downside risk than IonQ, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are larger than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.4M. IonQ's net income of -$52.5M is lower than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$14.8M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 248.79x versus 129.19x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of -423.36% compared to IonQ's net margin of 12.04%. IonQ's return on equity of -36.31% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 3.4%.

IonQ has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling downside risk potential of -18.96%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $89.20 which suggests that it could grow by 48.03%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than IonQ, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than IonQ.

IonQ has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.175%.

IonQ has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. IonQ pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

IonQ quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.1B. IonQ's net income of -$52.5M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $493M. Notably, IonQ's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Western Digital's PE ratio is 36.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for IonQ is 248.79x versus 1.42x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.