PSTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IonQ has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of -1725%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat IonQ's return on equity of -73.78%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.52, signalling upside risk potential of 55.48%. On the other hand IonQ has an analysts' consensus of $44.60 which suggests that it could grow by 95.19%. Given that IonQ has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe IonQ is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IonQ has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IonQ offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IonQ pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are larger than IonQ quarterly revenues of $11.7M. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is higher than IonQ's net income of -$202M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 153.33x while IonQ's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.91x versus 113.01x for IonQ. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 19.66%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.52, signalling upside risk potential of 55.48%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $129.07 which suggests that it could grow by 45.94%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than Micron Technology.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.652%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 153.33x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.91x versus 3.20x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetApp has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 18.22%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat NetApp's return on equity of 114.71%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.52, signalling upside risk potential of 55.48%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $121.21 which suggests that it could grow by 37.11%. Given that Pure Storage has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Pure Storage is more attractive than NetApp.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.074%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 2.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 42.19% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is lower than NetApp's net income of $299M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 153.33x while NetApp's PE ratio is 16.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.91x versus 2.86x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Western Digital has a net margin of 4.82% compared to Pure Storage's net margin of 13.86%. Pure Storage's return on equity of 7.83% beat Western Digital's return on equity of 11.02%.

Pure Storage has a consensus price target of $71.52, signalling upside risk potential of 55.48%. On the other hand Western Digital has an analysts' consensus of $73.62 which suggests that it could grow by 72.74%. Given that Western Digital has higher upside potential than Pure Storage, analysts believe Western Digital is more attractive than Pure Storage.

Pure Storage has a beta of 1.092, which suggesting that the stock is 9.236% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Western Digital has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.517%.

Pure Storage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Western Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Storage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Western Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Storage quarterly revenues are $879.8M, which are smaller than Western Digital quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Pure Storage's net income of $42.4M is lower than Western Digital's net income of $594M. Notably, Pure Storage's price-to-earnings ratio is 153.33x while Western Digital's PE ratio is 10.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Storage is 4.91x versus 0.94x for Western Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.