HIPO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 44.89%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 32.79%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.395, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.51%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.37 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 39.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $338.7M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $152M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 36.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.84x versus 5.78x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of -65.47%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.169%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.84x versus 0.31x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 6.77%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $96.60 which suggests that it could fall by -42.69%. Given that Hippo Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Hippo Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is higher than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Root's PE ratio is 98.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.84x versus 2.28x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 43.38% compared to Hippo Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Hippo Holdings's return on equity of -11.5% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Hippo Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.97%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 39.15%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Hippo Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Hippo Holdings.

Hippo Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.691%.

Hippo Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hippo Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hippo Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Hippo Holdings's net income of $44.2M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Hippo Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hippo Holdings is 1.84x versus 1.24x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.