TRUP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 0.44% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 18.2%. Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 19.88%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $54.86, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.02%. Given that AMERISAFE has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe AMERISAFE is more attractive than Trupanion.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.96%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.37 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 150.23% of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $327.5M, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $78.7M. Trupanion's net income of $1.4M is lower than AMERISAFE's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 16.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.73x versus 3.17x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Citizens Financial has a net margin of 0.44% compared to Trupanion's net margin of --. Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42% beat Citizens Financial's return on equity of --.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $54.86, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Citizens Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.79%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Citizens Financial, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Citizens Financial.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $327.5M, which are larger than Citizens Financial quarterly revenues of --. Trupanion's net income of $1.4M is higher than Citizens Financial's net income of --. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Citizens Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.73x versus -- for Citizens Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 0.44% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 0.82%. Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $54.86, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $40.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Trupanion, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Trupanion.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.621%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $327.5M, which are smaller than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Trupanion's net income of $1.4M is lower than CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 14.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.73x versus 0.91x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 0.44% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 20.17%. Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3%.

Trupanion has a consensus price target of $54.86, signalling upside risk potential of 7.56%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.73 which suggests that it could grow by 4.62%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Unum Group.

Trupanion has a beta of 1.605, which suggesting that the stock is 60.454% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.774%.

Trupanion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Trupanion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trupanion quarterly revenues are $327.5M, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Trupanion's net income of $1.4M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $645.7M. Notably, Trupanion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Unum Group's PE ratio is 7.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trupanion is 1.73x versus 1.10x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.