FGF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assurant has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 4.51%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Assurant's return on equity of 15.14%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Assurant has an analysts' consensus of $233.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.25%. Given that Assurant has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Assurant is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assurant has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.174%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Assurant offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Assurant pays out 23.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Assurant quarterly revenues of $3B. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Assurant's net income of $133.8M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.53x while Assurant's PE ratio is 15.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 0.97x for Assurant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Erie Indemnity has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 13.04%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 31.85%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Erie Indemnity has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fundamental Global has higher upside potential than Erie Indemnity, analysts believe Fundamental Global is more attractive than Erie Indemnity.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.851%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Erie Indemnity offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.28 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Erie Indemnity pays out 49.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Erie Indemnity quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Erie Indemnity's net income of $159.8M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.53x while Erie Indemnity's PE ratio is 39.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 5.96x for Erie Indemnity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 7.46%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Root's return on equity of -9.03%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.04%. Given that Root has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Root is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $305.7M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Root's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.53x while Root's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 1.06x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of -65.47% compared to Fundamental Global's net margin of 12.14%. Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 19.6%.

Fundamental Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.75%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.676, which suggesting that the stock is 32.355% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fundamental Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fundamental Global pays 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fundamental Global quarterly revenues are $17.5M, which are smaller than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $302M. Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M is lower than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $36.7M. Notably, Fundamental Global's price-to-earnings ratio is 0.53x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fundamental Global is 0.37x versus 1.91x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.