HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 8.2%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $205.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.2%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $257.13 which suggests that it could grow by 28.43%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.488%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 25.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.63x versus 1.79x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 2.83%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $205.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.2%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.76 which suggests that it could grow by 21.57%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.63x versus 1.45x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 11.83%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 28.45%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $205.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.2%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $548.61 which suggests that it could grow by 13.92%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.195, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.51%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $10.7B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.63x versus 1.73x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 6.85%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $205.68, signalling upside risk potential of 12.2%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 22.17%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.89%. RTX offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.13x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.63x versus 1.95x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.