GNRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dover has a net margin of 10.44% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of 74.41%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 13.54% beat Dover's return on equity of 47.69%.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand Dover has an analysts' consensus of $219.75 which suggests that it could grow by 21.32%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Dover, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Dover.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dover has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.503%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dover offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dover pays out 10.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Dover's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Dover quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Generac Holdings's net income of $128.9M is lower than Dover's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Dover's PE ratio is 9.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 1.83x versus 3.07x for Dover. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 10.44% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of 6.93%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 13.54% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.53%.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of $109.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.978, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.206%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $485.7M. Generac Holdings's net income of $128.9M is higher than Franklin Electric's net income of $33.7M. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 25.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 1.83x versus 2.29x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 10.44% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of 3.38%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 13.54% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 64.02%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Generac Holdings, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Generac Holdings.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.966%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. Generac Holdings's net income of $128.9M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Graham's PE ratio is 38.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 1.83x versus 1.77x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 10.44% compared to Generac Holdings's net margin of 2.82%. Generac Holdings's return on equity of 13.54% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.09%.

Generac Holdings has a consensus price target of $170.77, signalling upside risk potential of 30.95%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $178.82 which suggests that it could grow by 53.2%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Generac Holdings, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Generac Holdings.

Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.498, which suggesting that the stock is 49.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.378%.

Generac Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Generac Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Generac Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Generac Holdings's net income of $128.9M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $41.2M. Notably, Generac Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.15x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 39.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Generac Holdings is 1.83x versus 1.29x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.