AOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aura Systems has a net margin of 13.31% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of -32463.83%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 29.73% beat Aura Systems's return on equity of --.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Aura Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that A.O. Smith has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe A.O. Smith is more attractive than Aura Systems.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.771%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Aura Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A.O. Smith pays 32.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $902.6M, which are larger than Aura Systems quarterly revenues of $47K. A.O. Smith's net income of $120.1M is higher than Aura Systems's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Aura Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.62x versus 231.16x for Aura Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Electric has a net margin of 13.31% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 10.27%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 29.73% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.14%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Franklin Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 3.99%. Given that A.O. Smith has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe A.O. Smith is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.11%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Franklin Electric offers a yield of 1.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. A.O. Smith pays 32.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 21.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $902.6M, which are larger than Franklin Electric quarterly revenues of $531.4M. A.O. Smith's net income of $120.1M is higher than Franklin Electric's net income of $54.6M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Franklin Electric's PE ratio is 25.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.62x versus 2.30x for Franklin Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 13.31% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 9.69%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 29.73% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 12.3%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $178.91 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that A.O. Smith has higher upside potential than Generac Holdings, analysts believe A.O. Smith is more attractive than Generac Holdings.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.551%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A.O. Smith pays 32.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $902.6M, which are smaller than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. A.O. Smith's net income of $120.1M is higher than Generac Holdings's net income of $113.7M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 32.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.62x versus 2.29x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 13.31% compared to A.O. Smith's net margin of 4.92%. A.O. Smith's return on equity of 29.73% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.33%.

A.O. Smith has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.14%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.77%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than A.O. Smith, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than A.O. Smith.

A.O. Smith has a beta of 1.163, which suggesting that the stock is 16.34% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.79900000000001%.

A.O. Smith has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.89%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. A.O. Smith pays 32.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out -161.67% of its earnings as a dividend. A.O. Smith's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A.O. Smith quarterly revenues are $902.6M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. A.O. Smith's net income of $120.1M is higher than Regal Rexnord's net income of $72.7M. Notably, A.O. Smith's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.13x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 50.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A.O. Smith is 2.62x versus 1.72x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.