FELE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Power Group has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of --. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.14% beat American Power Group's return on equity of --.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand American Power Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than American Power Group, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than American Power Group.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Power Group has a beta of -1.303, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 230.261%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. American Power Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric pays 21.59% of its earnings as a dividend. American Power Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than American Power Group quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Electric's net income of $54.6M is higher than American Power Group's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.08x while American Power Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.30x versus 0.50x for American Power Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aura Systems has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of -32463.83%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.14% beat Aura Systems's return on equity of --.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand Aura Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.771%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Aura Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric pays 21.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are larger than Aura Systems quarterly revenues of $47K. Franklin Electric's net income of $54.6M is higher than Aura Systems's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.08x while Aura Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.30x versus 231.16x for Aura Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of 9.69%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.14% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 12.3%.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $178.91 which suggests that it could grow by 14.67%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.386, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.551%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric pays 21.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are smaller than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Franklin Electric's net income of $54.6M is lower than Generac Holdings's net income of $113.7M. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.08x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 32.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.30x versus 2.29x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 10.27% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of 4.92%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 15.14% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.33%.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 3.99%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.77%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.979, which suggesting that the stock is 2.11% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.79900000000001%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.01%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Franklin Electric pays 21.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out -161.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $531.4M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Franklin Electric's net income of $54.6M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.08x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 50.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.30x versus 1.72x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.