FOUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fair Isaac has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 34.67%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Fair Isaac's return on equity of --.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $129.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.8%. On the other hand Fair Isaac has an analysts' consensus of $2,046.56 which suggests that it could grow by 7.85%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.199%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fair Isaac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fair Isaac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are larger than Fair Isaac quarterly revenues of $440M. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is lower than Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.71x while Fair Isaac's PE ratio is 87.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.11x versus 26.70x for Fair Isaac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 34.62%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $129.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.8%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.24 which suggests that it could grow by 28.79%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Microsoft.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.71x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.11x versus 11.22x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roper Technologies has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 24.63%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Roper Technologies's return on equity of 8.54%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $129.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.8%. On the other hand Roper Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $625.43 which suggests that it could grow by 8.46%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Roper Technologies, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Roper Technologies.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roper Technologies has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.687%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roper Technologies offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roper Technologies pays out 20.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Roper Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are smaller than Roper Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is lower than Roper Technologies's net income of $462.3M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.71x while Roper Technologies's PE ratio is 40.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.11x versus 8.85x for Roper Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.25%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $129.40, signalling upside risk potential of 46.8%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $312.48 which suggests that it could grow by 25.25%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Workday.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.849%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.71x while Workday's PE ratio is 127.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.11x versus 7.95x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.