FOUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fair Isaac has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 34.67%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Fair Isaac's return on equity of --.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $114.52, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Fair Isaac has an analysts' consensus of $2,055.06 which suggests that it could grow by 5.26%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.95%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fair Isaac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fair Isaac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are larger than Fair Isaac quarterly revenues of $440M. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is lower than Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.15x while Fair Isaac's PE ratio is 89.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 1.92x versus 27.47x for Fair Isaac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paychex has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 34.41%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Paychex's return on equity of 44.75%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $114.52, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Paychex has an analysts' consensus of $144.96 which suggests that it could grow by 1.22%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Paychex, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Paychex.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paychex has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.789%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paychex offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex pays out 77.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are smaller than Paychex quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is lower than Paychex's net income of $519.3M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.15x while Paychex's PE ratio is 29.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 1.92x versus 9.53x for Paychex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Roper Technologies has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 24.63%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Roper Technologies's return on equity of 8.54%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $114.52, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Roper Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $625.34 which suggests that it could grow by 12.13%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Roper Technologies, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Roper Technologies.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roper Technologies has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.08%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roper Technologies offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roper Technologies pays out 20.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Roper Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are smaller than Roper Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is lower than Roper Technologies's net income of $462.3M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.15x while Roper Technologies's PE ratio is 38.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 1.92x versus 8.55x for Roper Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.25%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97% beat Workday's return on equity of 6.23%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $114.52, signalling upside risk potential of 42.66%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $298.61 which suggests that it could grow by 24.67%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Workday.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.323, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.275%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $887M, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M is higher than Workday's net income of $94M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.15x while Workday's PE ratio is 122.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 1.92x versus 7.63x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.