FICO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of -8.72%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of -0.68%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 13.7%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $407.72 which suggests that it could grow by 15.26%. Given that CrowdStrike Holdings has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe CrowdStrike Holdings is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.195, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.529%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$92.3M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.60x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 765.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 25.33x versus 22.23x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intuit has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 11.89%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Intuit's return on equity of 16.84%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 13.7%. On the other hand Intuit has an analysts' consensus of $705.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.84%. Given that Intuit has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe Intuit is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuit has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.049%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuit offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit pays out 34.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuit's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Intuit quarterly revenues of $4B. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is lower than Intuit's net income of $471M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.60x while Intuit's PE ratio is 55.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 25.33x versus 9.89x for Intuit. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paychex has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 31.39%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat Paychex's return on equity of 45.61%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 13.7%. On the other hand Paychex has an analysts' consensus of $139.87 which suggests that it could fall by -3.83%. Given that Fair Isaac has higher upside potential than Paychex, analysts believe Fair Isaac is more attractive than Paychex.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paychex has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.439%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paychex offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex pays out 77.81% of its earnings as a dividend. Paychex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than Paychex quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is lower than Paychex's net income of $413.4M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.60x while Paychex's PE ratio is 30.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 25.33x versus 9.80x for Paychex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of 34.67% compared to Fair Isaac's net margin of 14.55%. Fair Isaac's return on equity of -- beat PTC's return on equity of 12.89%.

Fair Isaac has a consensus price target of $2,046.56, signalling upside risk potential of 13.7%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $209.32 which suggests that it could grow by 34.39%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Fair Isaac, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Fair Isaac.

Fair Isaac has a beta of 1.412, which suggesting that the stock is 41.199% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.841%.

Fair Isaac has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fair Isaac pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fair Isaac quarterly revenues are $440M, which are smaller than PTC quarterly revenues of $565.1M. Fair Isaac's net income of $152.5M is higher than PTC's net income of $82.2M. Notably, Fair Isaac's price-to-earnings ratio is 82.60x while PTC's PE ratio is 48.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fair Isaac is 25.33x versus 8.14x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.