CDNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 18.49%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $317.85, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 25.19%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.43% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.556%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.97x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 52.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.25x versus 9.48x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dropbox has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 15.97%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Dropbox's return on equity of --.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $317.85, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Dropbox has an analysts' consensus of $28.10 which suggests that it could grow by 6.57%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Dropbox, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Dropbox.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.43% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dropbox has a beta of 0.766, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.437%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dropbox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dropbox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Dropbox quarterly revenues of $643.6M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Dropbox's net income of $102.8M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.97x while Dropbox's PE ratio is 18.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.25x versus 3.35x for Dropbox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shift4 Payments has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 13.08%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 23.97%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $317.85, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand Shift4 Payments has an analysts' consensus of $129.40 which suggests that it could grow by 47.92%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.43% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shift4 Payments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shift4 Payments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues of $887M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than Shift4 Payments's net income of $116M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.97x while Shift4 Payments's PE ratio is 28.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.25x versus 2.09x for Shift4 Payments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PTC has a net margin of 25.09% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 14.55%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 25.78% beat PTC's return on equity of 12.89%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $317.85, signalling upside risk potential of 22.96%. On the other hand PTC has an analysts' consensus of $209.32 which suggests that it could grow by 30.91%. Given that PTC has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe PTC is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.054, which suggesting that the stock is 5.43% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PTC has a beta of 1.218, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.841%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PTC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PTC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than PTC quarterly revenues of $565.1M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $340.2M is higher than PTC's net income of $82.2M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 66.97x while PTC's PE ratio is 49.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 15.25x versus 8.36x for PTC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.