ADSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Design Systems has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Autodesk's net margin of 19.59%. Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52% beat Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 27.48%.

Autodesk has a consensus price target of $327.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.64%. On the other hand Cadence Design Systems has an analysts' consensus of $323.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.9%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.746%.

Autodesk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadence Design Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autodesk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Design Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Autodesk quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Autodesk's net income of $275M is higher than Cadence Design Systems's net income of $238.1M. Notably, Autodesk's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.18x while Cadence Design Systems's PE ratio is 79.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk is 10.85x versus 18.93x for Cadence Design Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CrowdStrike Holdings has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Autodesk's net margin of -1.67%. Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52% beat CrowdStrike Holdings's return on equity of 4.89%.

Autodesk has a consensus price target of $327.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.64%. On the other hand CrowdStrike Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $375.18 which suggests that it could grow by 3.56%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than CrowdStrike Holdings, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than CrowdStrike Holdings.

Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CrowdStrike Holdings has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.217%.

Autodesk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CrowdStrike Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autodesk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CrowdStrike Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Autodesk quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than CrowdStrike Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Autodesk's net income of $275M is higher than CrowdStrike Holdings's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Autodesk's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.18x while CrowdStrike Holdings's PE ratio is 710.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk is 10.85x versus 24.09x for CrowdStrike Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Workday has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Autodesk's net margin of 8.94%. Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52% beat Workday's return on equity of 20.33%.

Autodesk has a consensus price target of $327.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.64%. On the other hand Workday has an analysts' consensus of $292.30 which suggests that it could grow by 7.05%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Workday, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Workday.

Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Workday has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.338%.

Autodesk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Workday offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autodesk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Workday pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Autodesk quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Workday quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Autodesk's net income of $275M is higher than Workday's net income of $193M. Notably, Autodesk's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.18x while Workday's PE ratio is 45.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk is 10.85x versus 9.00x for Workday. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zoom Communications has a net margin of 17.52% compared to Autodesk's net margin of 17.58%. Autodesk's return on equity of 51.52% beat Zoom Communications's return on equity of 11.5%.

Autodesk has a consensus price target of $327.01, signalling upside risk potential of 9.64%. On the other hand Zoom Communications has an analysts' consensus of $91.60 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Zoom Communications, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Zoom Communications.

Autodesk has a beta of 1.432, which suggesting that the stock is 43.152% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoom Communications has a beta of -0.029, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.897%.

Autodesk has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoom Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autodesk pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoom Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Autodesk quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Zoom Communications quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Autodesk's net income of $275M is higher than Zoom Communications's net income of $207.1M. Notably, Autodesk's price-to-earnings ratio is 59.18x while Zoom Communications's PE ratio is 28.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autodesk is 10.85x versus 5.81x for Zoom Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.