DHIL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group's net margin of 93.71%. Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 26.85% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $16.25 which suggests that it could grow by 7.69%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.835%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $7.4M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group is 2.64x versus 10.99x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group's net margin of 96.47%. Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 26.85% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could fall by -6.19%. Given that Gladstone Capital has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Gladstone Capital is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.396%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are smaller than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $26.9M. Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $7.4M is lower than Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group is 2.64x versus 5.00x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group's net margin of 90.38%. Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 26.85% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $7.4M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group is 2.64x versus 9.17x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Diamond Hill Investment Group's net margin of -121.48%. Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 26.85% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.45%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 1.034% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Diamond Hill Investment Group has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.15%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues are $26.6M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $7.4M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Diamond Hill Investment Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.26x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Diamond Hill Investment Group is 2.64x versus 26.17x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.