GBDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 93.71% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 99.99%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.47%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 2.99%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, which suggesting that the stock is 39.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.762%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.91%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.96x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.01x versus 7.34x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 93.71% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 96.47%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.47%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could fall by -5.85%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, which suggesting that the stock is 39.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.396%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.91%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $26.9M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M is higher than Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.96x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.01x versus 4.98x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 93.71% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 90.38%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.47%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, which suggesting that the stock is 39.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.91%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.96x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.01x versus 9.17x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 93.71% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of -121.48%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $16.25, signalling upside risk potential of 7.47%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.83%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, which suggesting that the stock is 39.835% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.91%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $118.8M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.96x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.01x versus 26.07x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.