AVAV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 8.61%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.28, signalling upside risk potential of 38.92%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $286.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.63%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than General Dynamics.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.01x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.55x versus 1.62x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of -39.54%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -41.51%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.28, signalling upside risk potential of 38.92%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $24.32 which suggests that it could grow by 23.9%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Rocket Lab USA, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Rocket Lab USA.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $132.4M. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is higher than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$52.3M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.01x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.55x versus 22.32x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 6.85%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.28, signalling upside risk potential of 38.92%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $140.38 which suggests that it could grow by 9.45%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than RTX.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RTX offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.01x while RTX's PE ratio is 36.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.55x versus 2.13x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Triumph Group has a net margin of -1.05% compared to AeroVironment's net margin of 4.63%. AeroVironment's return on equity of 3.93% beat Triumph Group's return on equity of --.

AeroVironment has a consensus price target of $203.28, signalling upside risk potential of 38.92%. On the other hand Triumph Group has an analysts' consensus of $22.22 which suggests that it could fall by -10.04%. Given that AeroVironment has higher upside potential than Triumph Group, analysts believe AeroVironment is more attractive than Triumph Group.

AeroVironment has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.141% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Triumph Group has a beta of 2.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.942%.

AeroVironment has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Triumph Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AeroVironment pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Triumph Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AeroVironment quarterly revenues are $167.6M, which are smaller than Triumph Group quarterly revenues of $315.6M. AeroVironment's net income of -$1.8M is lower than Triumph Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, AeroVironment's price-to-earnings ratio is 124.01x while Triumph Group's PE ratio is 3.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AeroVironment is 5.55x versus 1.54x for Triumph Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.