TRIP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expedia Group has a net margin of 0.24% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of 9.39%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 0.56% beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 49.71%.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $212.54 which suggests that it could grow by 22.28%. Given that Expedia Group has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Expedia Group is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.827, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.749%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $411M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Tripadvisor's net income of $1M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $299M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 744.50x while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 19.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.16x versus 1.73x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a net margin of 0.24% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of -16.86%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 0.56% beat Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of --.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.33 which suggests that it could grow by 58.24%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Tripadvisor, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Tripadvisor.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 212.238%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $411M, which are larger than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues of $148.6M. Tripadvisor's net income of $1M is higher than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of -$25M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 744.50x while Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.16x versus 0.84x for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextTrip has a net margin of 0.24% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of -993.31%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 0.56% beat NextTrip's return on equity of -317.98%.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand NextTrip has an analysts' consensus of $6.75 which suggests that it could fall by -4.58%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than NextTrip, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than NextTrip.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextTrip has a beta of 1.646, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.573%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NextTrip offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NextTrip pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $411M, which are larger than NextTrip quarterly revenues of $154.5K. Tripadvisor's net income of $1M is higher than NextTrip's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 744.50x while NextTrip's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.16x versus 8.41x for NextTrip. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of 0.24% compared to Tripadvisor's net margin of -30.52%. Tripadvisor's return on equity of 0.56% beat Vacasa's return on equity of -90.12%.

Tripadvisor has a consensus price target of $17.81, signalling upside risk potential of 19.58%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could fall by -54.46%. Given that Tripadvisor has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Tripadvisor is more attractive than Vacasa.

Tripadvisor has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.32% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tripadvisor has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tripadvisor pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tripadvisor quarterly revenues are $411M, which are larger than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $138M. Tripadvisor's net income of $1M is higher than Vacasa's net income of -$42.1M. Notably, Tripadvisor's price-to-earnings ratio is 744.50x while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tripadvisor is 1.16x versus 0.10x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.