LIND Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Capital Of North America has a net margin of 10.93% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of --. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Consolidated Capital Of North America's return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Consolidated Capital Of North America has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Consolidated Capital Of North America, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Consolidated Capital Of North America.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, which suggesting that the stock is 210.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Capital Of North America has a beta of 23.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2203.85%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Consolidated Capital Of North America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Capital Of North America pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $206M, which are larger than Consolidated Capital Of North America quarterly revenues of --. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M is higher than Consolidated Capital Of North America's net income of --. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Consolidated Capital Of North America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.09x versus -- for Consolidated Capital Of North America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Expedia Group has a net margin of 10.93% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 16.85%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Expedia Group's return on equity of 42.54%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Expedia Group has an analysts' consensus of $187.83 which suggests that it could fall by -0.54%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Expedia Group, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Expedia Group.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, which suggesting that the stock is 210.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expedia Group has a beta of 1.846, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.55%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Expedia Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Expedia Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $206M, which are smaller than Expedia Group quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M is lower than Expedia Group's net income of $684M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Expedia Group's PE ratio is 24.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.09x versus 1.95x for Expedia Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inspirato has a net margin of 10.93% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 6.27%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Inspirato's return on equity of --.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Inspirato has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 232.33%. Given that Inspirato has higher upside potential than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, analysts believe Inspirato is more attractive than Lindblad Expeditions Holdings.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, which suggesting that the stock is 210.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inspirato has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inspirato offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inspirato pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $206M, which are larger than Inspirato quarterly revenues of $69.1M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M is higher than Inspirato's net income of $4.3M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inspirato's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.09x versus 0.06x for Inspirato. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vacasa has a net margin of 10.93% compared to Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net margin of 13.2%. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Vacasa's return on equity of -65.75%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27.05%. On the other hand Vacasa has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.51%. Given that Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has higher upside potential than Vacasa, analysts believe Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is more attractive than Vacasa.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a beta of 3.106, which suggesting that the stock is 210.572% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vacasa has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vacasa offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vacasa pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Lindblad Expeditions Holdings quarterly revenues are $206M, which are smaller than Vacasa quarterly revenues of $314M. Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's net income of $22.5M is lower than Vacasa's net income of $41.4M. Notably, Lindblad Expeditions Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vacasa's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lindblad Expeditions Holdings is 1.09x versus 0.06x for Vacasa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.