SBUX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 11.66%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 44.07%.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.51, signalling upside risk potential of 8.39%. On the other hand Chipotle Mexican Grill has an analysts' consensus of $64.50 which suggests that it could grow by 31.64%. Given that Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.176%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Chipotle Mexican Grill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Chipotle Mexican Grill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Starbucks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Chipotle Mexican Grill quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Starbucks's net income of $780.8M is higher than Chipotle Mexican Grill's net income of $331.8M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while Chipotle Mexican Grill's PE ratio is 44.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 3.12x versus 5.96x for Chipotle Mexican Grill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 8.73%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Brinker International's return on equity of 4799.27%.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.51, signalling upside risk potential of 8.39%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $183.06 which suggests that it could grow by 25.89%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Starbucks, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.326%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Starbucks's net income of $780.8M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $118.5M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 25.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 3.12x versus 1.38x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McDonald's has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 31.56%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat McDonald's's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.51, signalling upside risk potential of 8.39%. On the other hand McDonald's has an analysts' consensus of $328.20 which suggests that it could grow by 6.91%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than McDonald's, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than McDonald's.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McDonald's has a beta of 0.709, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.055%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. McDonald's offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. McDonald's pays out 59.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than McDonald's quarterly revenues of $6.4B. Starbucks's net income of $780.8M is lower than McDonald's's net income of $2B. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while McDonald's's PE ratio is 26.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 3.12x versus 8.55x for McDonald's. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yum Brands has a net margin of 8.31% compared to Starbucks's net margin of 17.91%. Starbucks's return on equity of -- beat Yum Brands's return on equity of --.

Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.51, signalling upside risk potential of 8.39%. On the other hand Yum Brands has an analysts' consensus of $154.41 which suggests that it could fall by -0.41%. Given that Starbucks has higher upside potential than Yum Brands, analysts believe Starbucks is more attractive than Yum Brands.

Starbucks has a beta of 0.993, which suggesting that the stock is 0.692% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yum Brands has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.127%.

Starbucks has a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Yum Brands offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share. Starbucks pays 68.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Yum Brands pays out 50.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Starbucks quarterly revenues are $9.4B, which are larger than Yum Brands quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Starbucks's net income of $780.8M is higher than Yum Brands's net income of $423M. Notably, Starbucks's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.00x while Yum Brands's PE ratio is 29.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Starbucks is 3.12x versus 5.86x for Yum Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.