EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dine Brands Global has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 9.77%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Dine Brands Global's return on equity of --.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $118.69, signalling downside risk potential of -13.49%. On the other hand Dine Brands Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 38.47%. Given that Dine Brands Global has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Dine Brands Global is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, which suggesting that the stock is 151.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dine Brands Global has a beta of 1.725, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.537%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dine Brands Global offers a yield of 6.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Dine Brands Global pays out 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Dine Brands Global quarterly revenues of $195M. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is higher than Dine Brands Global's net income of $19.1M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.46x while Dine Brands Global's PE ratio is 4.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.38x versus 0.55x for Dine Brands Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 7.44%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 48.85%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $118.69, signalling downside risk potential of -13.49%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $193.25 which suggests that it could grow by 3.54%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, which suggesting that the stock is 151.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.315, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.498%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 61.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $215.1M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.46x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.38x versus 1.93x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of -6.87%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $118.69, signalling downside risk potential of -13.49%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $13.63 which suggests that it could grow by 66.03%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, which suggesting that the stock is 151.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.683, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 168.312%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $274.6M. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$18.9M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.46x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.38x versus 0.06x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 6.63%. Brinker International's return on equity of -- beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 31.98%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $118.69, signalling downside risk potential of -13.49%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $153.43 which suggests that it could grow by 7.79%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 2.520, which suggesting that the stock is 151.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.616%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 48.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Brinker International's net income of $38.5M is lower than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $84.4M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.46x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 31.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.38x versus 2.40x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.