RRC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Expand Energy has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of -19.96%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Expand Energy's return on equity of -6%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.15%. On the other hand Expand Energy has an analysts' consensus of $123.63 which suggests that it could grow by 17.41%. Given that Expand Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Expand Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Expand Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Expand Energy offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Expand Energy pays out -54.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Range Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Expand Energy quarterly revenues of $2B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is higher than Expand Energy's net income of -$399M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Expand Energy's PE ratio is 63.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.25x versus 3.98x for Expand Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matador Resources has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 23.86%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 18.13%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.15%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $65.17 which suggests that it could grow by 58.67%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 2.741, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 174.1%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 2.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 11.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $1B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than Matador Resources's net income of $240.1M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 5.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.25x versus 1.39x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 22.53%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.15%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $39.67 which suggests that it could grow by 68.94%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.25x versus 1.02x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 11.47% compared to Range Resources's net margin of 9.39%. Range Resources's return on equity of 6.98% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Range Resources has a consensus price target of $39.71, signalling upside risk potential of 14.15%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.41 which suggests that it could grow by 14.59%. Given that Exxon Mobil has higher upside potential than Range Resources, analysts believe Exxon Mobil is more attractive than Range Resources.

Range Resources has a beta of 1.732, which suggesting that the stock is 73.162% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Range Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Range Resources pays 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Range Resources quarterly revenues are $846.3M, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Range Resources's net income of $97.1M is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Range Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.06x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Range Resources is 3.25x versus 1.38x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.