Financhill
Sell
35

SM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$36.30
Seasonality move :
6.99%
Day range:
$36.13 - $37.48
52-week range:
$34.76 - $53.26
Dividend yield:
2.02%
P/E ratio:
5.11x
P/S ratio:
1.74x
P/B ratio:
1.03x
Volume:
3.3M
Avg. volume:
1.2M
1-year change:
-3.46%
Market cap:
$4.2B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
$7.16

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SM
SM Energy
$638M $1.50 42.25% -6.18% $56.36
CRK
Comstock Resources
$317.6M -$0.16 -5.65% -97.75% $11.54
CTRA
Coterra Energy
$1.3B $0.34 -12.65% -23.22% $33.03
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$22M $0.04 8.1% -33.33% --
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
$296.6M $2.87 28.71% -60.3% $189.71
NOG
Northern Oil & Gas
$543.3M $1.19 9.46% -66.66% $48.79
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SM
SM Energy
$36.59 $56.36 $4.2B 5.11x $0.20 2.02% 1.74x
CRK
Comstock Resources
$15.82 $11.54 $4.6B 43.27x $0.13 0% 3.46x
CTRA
Coterra Energy
$23.68 $33.03 $17.4B 14.35x $0.21 3.55% 3.14x
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$4.88 -- $163.9M 34.86x $0.12 9.84% 1.84x
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
$165.52 $189.71 $2.9B 14.87x $0.00 0% 3.36x
NOG
Northern Oil & Gas
$35.57 $48.79 $3.6B 4.27x $0.42 4.55% 1.66x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SM
SM Energy
39.99% 0.941 59.18% 3.38x
CRK
Comstock Resources
56.23% 1.201 88.84% 0.37x
CTRA
Coterra Energy
13.68% 0.888 11.72% 1.49x
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
33.16% 1.754 22.13% 1.43x
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
24.85% 1.873 25.33% 0.33x
NOG
Northern Oil & Gas
45.78% 0.585 55.25% 0.92x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SM
SM Energy
$291.1M $244.7M 15% 22.26% 54.23% $149.3M
CRK
Comstock Resources
-$52.3M -$62.2M -1.24% -2.66% 4.63% -$131.1M
CTRA
Coterra Energy
$476M $324M 8.09% 9.54% 25.53% $359M
EPM
Evolution Petroleum
$4.4M $1.9M 4.3% 5.54% 16.94% $4.6M
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
$114.9M $7.1M 9.17% 12.01% -1.37% $57.6M
NOG
Northern Oil & Gas
$208.3M $195.8M 21.48% 42.56% 84.2% $3.9M

SM Energy vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SM or CRK?

    Comstock Resources has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of -9.49%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Comstock Resources's return on equity of -2.66%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    -17.19% -$0.09 $5.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or CRK?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.4%. On the other hand Comstock Resources has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could fall by -27.04%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Comstock Resources, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Comstock Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    6 7 0
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    1 9 2
  • Is SM or CRK More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Resources has a beta of 0.572, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.785%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or CRK?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Comstock Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Resources pays out 65.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or CRK?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Comstock Resources quarterly revenues of $304.5M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Comstock Resources's net income of -$28.9M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.11x while Comstock Resources's PE ratio is 43.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.74x versus 3.46x for Comstock Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    1.74x 5.11x $642.4M $240.5M
    CRK
    Comstock Resources
    3.46x 43.27x $304.5M -$28.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or CTRA?

    Coterra Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 18.54%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Coterra Energy's return on equity of 9.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    CTRA
    Coterra Energy
    35.03% $0.34 $15.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or CTRA?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.4%. On the other hand Coterra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $33.03 which suggests that it could grow by 39.47%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Coterra Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Coterra Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    6 7 0
    CTRA
    Coterra Energy
    12 4 0
  • Is SM or CTRA More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.457%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or CTRA?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Coterra Energy offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy pays out 54.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or CTRA?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are smaller than Coterra Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is lower than Coterra Energy's net income of $252M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.11x while Coterra Energy's PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.74x versus 3.14x for Coterra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    1.74x 5.11x $642.4M $240.5M
    CTRA
    Coterra Energy
    3.14x 14.35x $1.4B $252M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or EPM?

    Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 9.43%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    20.01% $0.06 $119.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or EPM?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.4%. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.25%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than SM Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    6 7 0
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    0 0 0
  • Is SM or EPM More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.868, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.231%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or EPM?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Evolution Petroleum's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or EPM?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.11x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 34.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.74x versus 1.84x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    1.74x 5.11x $642.4M $240.5M
    EPM
    Evolution Petroleum
    1.84x 34.86x $21.9M $2.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or GPOR?

    Gulfport Energy has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of -6.47%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 12.01%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    GPOR
    Gulfport Energy
    53.21% -$0.83 $2.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or GPOR?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.4%. On the other hand Gulfport Energy has an analysts' consensus of $189.71 which suggests that it could grow by 15.46%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Gulfport Energy, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Gulfport Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    6 7 0
    GPOR
    Gulfport Energy
    6 2 0
  • Is SM or GPOR More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulfport Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or GPOR?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Gulfport Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Gulfport Energy pays out 0.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or GPOR?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Gulfport Energy quarterly revenues of $215.9M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is higher than Gulfport Energy's net income of -$14M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.11x while Gulfport Energy's PE ratio is 14.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.74x versus 3.36x for Gulfport Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    1.74x 5.11x $642.4M $240.5M
    GPOR
    Gulfport Energy
    3.36x 14.87x $215.9M -$14M
  • Which has Higher Returns SM or NOG?

    Northern Oil & Gas has a net margin of 37.44% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 57.9%. SM Energy's return on equity of 22.26% beat Northern Oil & Gas's return on equity of 42.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SM
    SM Energy
    45.31% $2.09 $6.8B
    NOG
    Northern Oil & Gas
    40.4% $2.96 $4.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About SM or NOG?

    SM Energy has a consensus price target of $56.36, signalling upside risk potential of 45.4%. On the other hand Northern Oil & Gas has an analysts' consensus of $48.79 which suggests that it could grow by 37.17%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Northern Oil & Gas, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Northern Oil & Gas.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SM
    SM Energy
    6 7 0
    NOG
    Northern Oil & Gas
    7 3 0
  • Is SM or NOG More Risky?

    SM Energy has a beta of 4.152, which suggesting that the stock is 315.189% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northern Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.851, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.144%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SM or NOG?

    SM Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.02%. Northern Oil & Gas offers a yield of 4.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. SM Energy pays 8.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Oil & Gas pays out 13.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SM or NOG?

    SM Energy quarterly revenues are $642.4M, which are larger than Northern Oil & Gas quarterly revenues of $515.5M. SM Energy's net income of $240.5M is lower than Northern Oil & Gas's net income of $298.4M. Notably, SM Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.11x while Northern Oil & Gas's PE ratio is 4.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SM Energy is 1.74x versus 1.66x for Northern Oil & Gas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SM
    SM Energy
    1.74x 5.11x $642.4M $240.5M
    NOG
    Northern Oil & Gas
    1.66x 4.27x $515.5M $298.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?
NVIDIA vs Broadcom Stock: Which Is Best?

If you want to invest in an AI-leading tech company,…

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23

Quantum [QMCO] is down 2.5% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23

Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 3.2% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 6.14% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock