RIG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of 29.06%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.58%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $204.31 which suggests that it could grow by 27.01%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.265%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Transocean's net income of $7M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 10.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.87x versus 3.12x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leopard Energy has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1621.32%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Leopard Energy's return on equity of -1169.22%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Leopard Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Leopard Energy, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Leopard Energy.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leopard Energy has a beta of -0.095, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.472%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Leopard Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Leopard Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are larger than Leopard Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5K. Transocean's net income of $7M is higher than Leopard Energy's net income of -$24.3K. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Leopard Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.87x versus 23.94x for Leopard Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Occidental Petroleum has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of -1.88%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat Occidental Petroleum's return on equity of 9.38%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand Occidental Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $58.78 which suggests that it could grow by 19.5%. Given that Transocean has higher upside potential than Occidental Petroleum, analysts believe Transocean is more attractive than Occidental Petroleum.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Occidental Petroleum has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.519%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Occidental Petroleum offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum pays out 47.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Occidental Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are smaller than Occidental Petroleum quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Transocean's net income of $7M is higher than Occidental Petroleum's net income of -$127M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Occidental Petroleum's PE ratio is 20.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.87x versus 1.78x for Occidental Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SM Energy has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Transocean's net margin of 22.53%. Transocean's return on equity of -4.91% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 19.8%.

Transocean has a consensus price target of $4.57, signalling upside risk potential of 37.59%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $47.67 which suggests that it could grow by 60.12%. Given that SM Energy has higher upside potential than Transocean, analysts believe SM Energy is more attractive than Transocean.

Transocean has a beta of 2.287, which suggesting that the stock is 128.749% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 3.763, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 276.328%.

Transocean has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SM Energy offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Transocean pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Transocean quarterly revenues are $952M, which are larger than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $835.9M. Transocean's net income of $7M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $188.3M. Notably, Transocean's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SM Energy's PE ratio is 4.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Transocean is 0.87x versus 1.29x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.