RF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citigroup has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 14.58%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Citigroup's return on equity of 6.09%.

Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.02, signalling upside risk potential of 39.46%. On the other hand Citigroup has an analysts' consensus of $88.66 which suggests that it could grow by 52.52%. Given that Citigroup has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Citigroup is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citigroup has a beta of 1.289, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.912%.

Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Citigroup offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.56 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Citigroup pays out 41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Citigroup quarterly revenues of $19.6B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Citigroup's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while Citigroup's PE ratio is 9.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.42x versus 1.38x for Citigroup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JPMorgan Chase & has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 32.73%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat JPMorgan Chase &'s return on equity of 17.24%.

Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.02, signalling upside risk potential of 39.46%. On the other hand JPMorgan Chase & has an analysts' consensus of $263.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.36%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than JPMorgan Chase &, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than JPMorgan Chase &.

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JPMorgan Chase & has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.712%.

Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. JPMorgan Chase & offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.40 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. JPMorgan Chase & pays out 25.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than JPMorgan Chase & quarterly revenues of $42.8B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than JPMorgan Chase &'s net income of $14B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while JPMorgan Chase &'s PE ratio is 10.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.42x versus 3.57x for JPMorgan Chase &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 25.22%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Truist Financial's return on equity of 7.73%.

Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.02, signalling upside risk potential of 39.46%. On the other hand Truist Financial has an analysts' consensus of $49.04 which suggests that it could grow by 40.97%. Given that Truist Financial has higher upside potential than Regions Financial, analysts believe Truist Financial is more attractive than Regions Financial.

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial has a beta of 0.911, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.862%.

Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Truist Financial offers a yield of 5.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial pays out 65.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Truist Financial quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Truist Financial's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while Truist Financial's PE ratio is 10.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.42x versus 3.51x for Truist Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 29.42% compared to Regions Financial's net margin of 24.92%. Regions Financial's return on equity of 10.71% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.79%.

Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $26.02, signalling upside risk potential of 39.46%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $82.02 which suggests that it could grow by 34.51%. Given that Regions Financial has higher upside potential than Wells Fargo &, analysts believe Regions Financial is more attractive than Wells Fargo &.

Regions Financial has a beta of 1.014, which suggesting that the stock is 1.377% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.021%.

Regions Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.31%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Regions Financial pays 52.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Regions Financial quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Regions Financial's net income of $534M is lower than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $5.1B. Notably, Regions Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.62x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 11.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Regions Financial is 2.42x versus 2.57x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.