PWR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

EMCOR Group has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 7.31%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54% beat EMCOR Group's return on equity of 35.99%.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $333.37, signalling upside risk potential of 1.51%. On the other hand EMCOR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.93%. Given that EMCOR Group has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe EMCOR Group is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EMCOR Group has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.259%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. EMCOR Group offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Quanta Services pays 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. EMCOR Group pays out 5.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than EMCOR Group quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M is higher than EMCOR Group's net income of $270.3M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.59x while EMCOR Group's PE ratio is 23.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.15x versus 1.55x for EMCOR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluor has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 1.32%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54% beat Fluor's return on equity of 12.15%.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $333.37, signalling upside risk potential of 1.51%. On the other hand Fluor has an analysts' consensus of $57.75 which suggests that it could grow by 14.72%. Given that Fluor has higher upside potential than Quanta Services, analysts believe Fluor is more attractive than Quanta Services.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluor has a beta of 1.890, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.961%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Fluor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Fluor pays out 20.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Fluor quarterly revenues of $4.1B. Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M is higher than Fluor's net income of $54M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.59x while Fluor's PE ratio is 34.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.15x versus 0.55x for Fluor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of 8.14%. Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.82%.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $333.37, signalling upside risk potential of 1.51%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than IES Holdings.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.178%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $775.8M. Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $63.2M. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.59x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 21.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.15x versus 1.51x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunvault Energy has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Quanta Services's net margin of --. Quanta Services's return on equity of 12.54% beat Sunvault Energy's return on equity of --.

Quanta Services has a consensus price target of $333.37, signalling upside risk potential of 1.51%. On the other hand Sunvault Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Quanta Services has higher upside potential than Sunvault Energy, analysts believe Quanta Services is more attractive than Sunvault Energy.

Quanta Services has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.458% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunvault Energy has a beta of 0.833, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.738%.

Quanta Services has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.11%. Sunvault Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quanta Services pays 6.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Sunvault Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanta Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quanta Services quarterly revenues are $6.5B, which are larger than Sunvault Energy quarterly revenues of --. Quanta Services's net income of $293.2M is higher than Sunvault Energy's net income of --. Notably, Quanta Services's price-to-earnings ratio is 60.59x while Sunvault Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quanta Services is 2.15x versus 0.22x for Sunvault Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.