PNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Omega Flex has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Pentair PLC's net margin of 18.56%. Pentair PLC's return on equity of 20.19% beat Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86%.

Pentair PLC has a consensus price target of $111.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Omega Flex has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pentair PLC has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Pentair PLC is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.199, which suggesting that the stock is 19.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.492%.

Pentair PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Omega Flex offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pentair PLC pays 23.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex pays out 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pentair PLC quarterly revenues are $993.4M, which are larger than Omega Flex quarterly revenues of $24.9M. Pentair PLC's net income of $139.6M is higher than Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M. Notably, Pentair PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Omega Flex's PE ratio is 23.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pentair PLC is 4.18x versus 4.18x for Omega Flex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Pentair PLC's net margin of 13.62%. Pentair PLC's return on equity of 20.19% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.13%.

Pentair PLC has a consensus price target of $111.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $338.20 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that RBC Bearings has higher upside potential than Pentair PLC, analysts believe RBC Bearings is more attractive than Pentair PLC.

Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.199, which suggesting that the stock is 19.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.815%.

Pentair PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pentair PLC pays 23.32% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pentair PLC quarterly revenues are $993.4M, which are larger than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $397.9M. Pentair PLC's net income of $139.6M is higher than RBC Bearings's net income of $54.2M. Notably, Pentair PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 44.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pentair PLC is 4.18x versus 5.60x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Pentair PLC's net margin of 3.19%. Pentair PLC's return on equity of 20.19% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5%.

Pentair PLC has a consensus price target of $111.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.8%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Pentair PLC, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Pentair PLC.

Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.199, which suggesting that the stock is 19.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.632%.

Pentair PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Pentair PLC pays 23.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pentair PLC quarterly revenues are $993.4M, which are larger than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $129.7M. Pentair PLC's net income of $139.6M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M. Notably, Pentair PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pentair PLC is 4.18x versus 0.88x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 14.05% compared to Pentair PLC's net margin of 10.31%. Pentair PLC's return on equity of 20.19% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Pentair PLC has a consensus price target of $111.33, signalling upside risk potential of 8.77%. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.02%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Pentair PLC, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Pentair PLC.

Pentair PLC has a beta of 1.199, which suggesting that the stock is 19.851% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.053%.

Pentair PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Pentair PLC pays 23.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pentair PLC quarterly revenues are $993.4M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Pentair PLC's net income of $139.6M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Pentair PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.59x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pentair PLC is 4.18x versus 3.41x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.