OFLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 18.56% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of -82.25%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -281.97%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9905767.09%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 3.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 247.194%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omega Flex pays 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -0.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $24.9M, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $31.1M. Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 4.18x versus 0.03x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 18.56% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 7.68%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 10.73%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $43.50 which suggests that it could grow by 37.06%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.808%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Omega Flex pays 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 52.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $24.9M, which are smaller than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $168.2M. Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M is lower than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 26.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 4.18x versus 1.54x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 18.56% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 3.19%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 9.5%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53.8%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.632%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Omega Flex pays 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $24.9M, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $129.7M. Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $4.1M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 12.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 4.18x versus 0.88x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 18.56% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 10.31%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 22.86% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.1%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $136.36 which suggests that it could grow by 25.02%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.375, which suggesting that the stock is 62.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.053%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.17%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Omega Flex pays 63.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $24.9M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Omega Flex's net income of $4.6M is lower than Xylem's net income of $217M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.41x while Xylem's PE ratio is 33.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 4.18x versus 3.41x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.