PCG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Edison International has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 11.09%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Edison International's return on equity of 8.47%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.21%. On the other hand Edison International has an analysts' consensus of $89.53 which suggests that it could grow by 12.59%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Edison International, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Edison International.

PG&E has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.98800000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Edison International has a beta of 0.920, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.05%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Edison International offers a yield of 3.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International pays out 86.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Edison International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Edison International quarterly revenues of $5.2B. PG&E's net income of $579M is higher than Edison International's net income of $577M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Edison International's PE ratio is 23.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.71x versus 1.78x for Edison International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 25.29%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Otter Tail's return on equity of 20.19%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.21%. On the other hand Otter Tail has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Otter Tail, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Otter Tail.

PG&E has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.98800000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail has a beta of 0.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.475%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Otter Tail offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Otter Tail quarterly revenues of $338M. PG&E's net income of $579M is higher than Otter Tail's net income of $85.5M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Otter Tail's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.71x versus 2.36x for Otter Tail. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pinnacle West Capital has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 22.33%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Pinnacle West Capital's return on equity of 9.58%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.21%. On the other hand Pinnacle West Capital has an analysts' consensus of $93.53 which suggests that it could grow by 10.09%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Pinnacle West Capital, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Pinnacle West Capital.

PG&E has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.98800000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pinnacle West Capital has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.624%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Pinnacle West Capital offers a yield of 4.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital pays out 77.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Pinnacle West Capital quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PG&E's net income of $579M is higher than Pinnacle West Capital's net income of $395M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Pinnacle West Capital's PE ratio is 16.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.71x versus 1.95x for Pinnacle West Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of 9.75% compared to PG&E's net margin of 18.72%. PG&E's return on equity of 10.68% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

PG&E has a consensus price target of $23.43, signalling upside risk potential of 18.21%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $72.39 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that PG&E has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe PG&E is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

PG&E has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.98800000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.995%.

PG&E has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.2%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. PG&E pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PG&E quarterly revenues are $5.9B, which are larger than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. PG&E's net income of $579M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, PG&E's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.48x while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PG&E is 1.71x versus 2.73x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.