NDAQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 57.61%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.57%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.17, signalling upside risk potential of 6.65%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $242.38 which suggests that it could grow by 1.21%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than CME Group.

Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.731%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. CME Group offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Nasdaq pays 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 100.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Nasdaq's net income of $306M is lower than CME Group's net income of $912.8M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.26x while CME Group's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 6.43x versus 14.26x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 21.66%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.17, signalling upside risk potential of 6.65%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $183.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.96%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.177%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Nasdaq pays 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3B. Nasdaq's net income of $306M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.26x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 35.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 6.43x versus 7.59x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moodys has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 29.45%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57% beat Moodys's return on equity of 53.93%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.17, signalling upside risk potential of 6.65%. On the other hand Moodys has an analysts' consensus of $503.31 which suggests that it could grow by 4.77%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Moodys, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Moodys.

Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moodys has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.963%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. Moodys offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. Nasdaq pays 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Moodys pays out 35.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than Moodys quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Nasdaq's net income of $306M is lower than Moodys's net income of $534M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.26x while Moodys's PE ratio is 43.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 6.43x versus 12.76x for Moodys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 16.09% compared to Nasdaq's net margin of 27.16%. Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21%.

Nasdaq has a consensus price target of $84.17, signalling upside risk potential of 6.65%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $580.91 which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, which suggesting that the stock is 3.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.149%.

Nasdaq has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.19%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Nasdaq pays 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nasdaq quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Nasdaq's net income of $306M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $971M. Notably, Nasdaq's price-to-earnings ratio is 47.26x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 44.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nasdaq is 6.43x versus 11.50x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.