ICE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CME Group has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 57.61%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23% beat CME Group's return on equity of 12.57%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $183.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.96%. On the other hand CME Group has an analysts' consensus of $242.38 which suggests that it could grow by 1.21%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than CME Group, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than CME Group.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CME Group has a beta of 0.563, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.731%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. CME Group offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. CME Group pays out 100.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but CME Group's is not.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than CME Group quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M is lower than CME Group's net income of $912.8M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.74x while CME Group's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 7.59x versus 14.26x for CME Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 0.53%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23% beat Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's return on equity of -1.03%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $183.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.96%. On the other hand Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.31%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dun & Bradstreet Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Dun & Bradstreet Holdings pays out -183.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings quarterly revenues of $609.1M. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M is higher than Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.74x while Dun & Bradstreet Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 7.59x versus 2.23x for Dun & Bradstreet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 16.09%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $183.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.96%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $84.17 which suggests that it could grow by 6.65%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Nasdaq, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Nasdaq.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.968, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M is higher than Nasdaq's net income of $306M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.74x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 47.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 7.59x versus 6.43x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 21.66% compared to Intercontinental Exchange's net margin of 27.16%. Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a consensus price target of $183.50, signalling upside risk potential of 21.96%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $580.91 which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than S&P Global, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than S&P Global.

Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.082, which suggesting that the stock is 8.177% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.191, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.149%.

Intercontinental Exchange has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.2%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Intercontinental Exchange pays 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $971M. Notably, Intercontinental Exchange's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.74x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 44.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intercontinental Exchange is 7.59x versus 11.50x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.