LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 26.79% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 11.31%. Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.25%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $92.82, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $183.16 which suggests that it could grow by 47%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, which suggesting that the stock is 46.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.343%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Lam Research's net income of $1.1B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $771M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 112.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.22x versus 8.38x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 26.79% compared to Lam Research's net margin of -125.26%. Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11% beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $92.82, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 20.44%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than Intel.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, which suggesting that the stock is 46.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Intel offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Lam Research's net income of $1.1B is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.22x versus 1.59x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 26.79% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 33.29%. Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11% beat KLA's return on equity of 92.37%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $92.82, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $789.80 which suggests that it could grow by 21.89%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, which suggesting that the stock is 46.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.48%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. KLA offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Lam Research's net income of $1.1B is higher than KLA's net income of $945.9M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while KLA's PE ratio is 29.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.22x versus 8.57x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 26.79% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 21.47%. Lam Research's return on equity of 49.11% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $92.82, signalling upside risk potential of 25.77%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $132.01 which suggests that it could grow by 47.13%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.463, which suggesting that the stock is 46.279% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.005%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.17%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.1B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.85x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 25.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.22x versus 3.48x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.