HON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

3M has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of 21.8%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 32.75% beat 3M's return on equity of 94.56%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $246.81, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand 3M has an analysts' consensus of $146.68 which suggests that it could grow by 13.73%. Given that 3M has higher upside potential than Honeywell International, analysts believe 3M is more attractive than Honeywell International.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 3M has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.252%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. 3M offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.46% of its earnings as a dividend. 3M pays out -47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are larger than 3M quarterly revenues of $6.3B. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than 3M's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while 3M's PE ratio is 16.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.94x versus 2.07x for 3M. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of -70.61%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 32.75% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $246.81, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of -0.311, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.103%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Honeywell International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.94x versus 8.28x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of -6.72%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 32.75% beat Seaboard's return on equity of -0.04%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $246.81, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than Seaboard.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.355, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.533%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 4.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are larger than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than Seaboard's net income of -$149M. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Seaboard's PE ratio is 12.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.94x versus 0.27x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Partners Holdings LP has a net margin of 14.53% compared to Honeywell International's net margin of 7%. Honeywell International's return on equity of 32.75% beat Steel Partners Holdings LP's return on equity of 22.21%.

Honeywell International has a consensus price target of $246.81, signalling upside risk potential of 8.66%. On the other hand Steel Partners Holdings LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Honeywell International has higher upside potential than Steel Partners Holdings LP, analysts believe Honeywell International is more attractive than Steel Partners Holdings LP.

Honeywell International has a beta of 1.053, which suggesting that the stock is 5.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Partners Holdings LP has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.845%.

Honeywell International has a quarterly dividend of $1.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.92%. Steel Partners Holdings LP offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Honeywell International pays 50.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Partners Holdings LP pays out 6.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Honeywell International quarterly revenues are $9.7B, which are larger than Steel Partners Holdings LP quarterly revenues of $520.4M. Honeywell International's net income of $1.4B is higher than Steel Partners Holdings LP's net income of $36.4M. Notably, Honeywell International's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.23x while Steel Partners Holdings LP's PE ratio is 4.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Honeywell International is 3.94x versus 0.52x for Steel Partners Holdings LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.