HBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 13.88%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $7.76, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.48 which suggests that it could grow by 23.91%. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.753, which suggesting that the stock is 75.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.258%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $796.7M, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 21.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.55x versus 2.19x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 0.09%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $7.76, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.43%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.753, which suggesting that the stock is 75.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.439%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $796.7M, which are smaller than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.55x versus 0.55x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VF has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 5.92%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37% beat VF's return on equity of -27.74%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $7.76, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand VF has an analysts' consensus of $26.27 which suggests that it could grow by 54.52%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Hanesbrands, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Hanesbrands.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.753, which suggesting that the stock is 75.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VF has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.935%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VF offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VF pays out -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $796.7M, which are smaller than VF quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M is lower than VF's net income of $167.8M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.55x versus 0.65x for VF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

YETI Holdings has a net margin of -1.62% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 9.73%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -159.37% beat YETI Holdings's return on equity of 24.49%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $7.76, signalling upside risk potential of 28.43%. On the other hand YETI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $43.94 which suggests that it could grow by 26.33%. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than YETI Holdings, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than YETI Holdings.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.753, which suggesting that the stock is 75.262% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison YETI Holdings has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.984%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. YETI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. YETI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $796.7M, which are larger than YETI Holdings quarterly revenues of $546.5M. Hanesbrands's net income of -$12.9M is lower than YETI Holdings's net income of $53.2M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while YETI Holdings's PE ratio is 16.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.55x versus 1.63x for YETI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.