VFC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ford Motor has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 3.78%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Ford Motor's return on equity of 13.45%.

VF has a consensus price target of $26.27, signalling upside risk potential of 59.49%. On the other hand Ford Motor has an analysts' consensus of $10.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.91%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ford Motor, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ford Motor.

VF has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ford Motor has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.114%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Ford Motor offers a yield of 7.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor pays out 53.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Ford Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than Ford Motor quarterly revenues of $48.2B. VF's net income of $167.8M is lower than Ford Motor's net income of $1.8B. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ford Motor's PE ratio is 7.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.63x versus 0.22x for Ford Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of -6.97%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92%.

VF has a consensus price target of $26.27, signalling upside risk potential of 59.49%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 66.28%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than VF, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than VF.

VF has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.673%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $130.7M. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 8.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.63x versus 0.42x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 13.88%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 28.48%.

VF has a consensus price target of $26.27, signalling upside risk potential of 59.49%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $292.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.22%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

VF has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.503, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.258%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 30.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $2.1B. VF's net income of $167.8M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $297.4M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 21.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.63x versus 2.15x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of 5.92% compared to VF's net margin of 0.09%. VF's return on equity of -27.74% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -6.29%.

VF has a consensus price target of $26.27, signalling upside risk potential of 59.49%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 52.5%. Given that VF has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe VF is more attractive than Under Armour.

VF has a beta of 1.469, which suggesting that the stock is 46.935% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.439%.

VF has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. VF pays -31.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

VF quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.4B. VF's net income of $167.8M is higher than Under Armour's net income of $1.2M. Notably, VF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for VF is 0.63x versus 0.53x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.