GWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MSC Industrial Direct has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 5.02%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat MSC Industrial Direct's return on equity of 16.85%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,052.10, signalling upside risk potential of 8.12%. On the other hand MSC Industrial Direct has an analysts' consensus of $85.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.62%. Given that MSC Industrial Direct has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe MSC Industrial Direct is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.819%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. MSC Industrial Direct offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 72.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than MSC Industrial Direct quarterly revenues of $928.5M. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than MSC Industrial Direct's net income of $46.6M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.14x while MSC Industrial Direct's PE ratio is 18.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.78x versus 1.15x for MSC Industrial Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ozop Energy Solutions has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of -2817.6%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat Ozop Energy Solutions's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,052.10, signalling upside risk potential of 8.12%. On the other hand Ozop Energy Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Ozop Energy Solutions, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Ozop Energy Solutions.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ozop Energy Solutions has a beta of -2.418, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 341.778%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Ozop Energy Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Ozop Energy Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Ozop Energy Solutions quarterly revenues of $74.3K. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than Ozop Energy Solutions's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.14x while Ozop Energy Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.78x versus 0.65x for Ozop Energy Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solidion Technology has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of --. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat Solidion Technology's return on equity of --.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,052.10, signalling upside risk potential of 8.12%. On the other hand Solidion Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that W.W. Grainger has higher upside potential than Solidion Technology, analysts believe W.W. Grainger is more attractive than Solidion Technology.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solidion Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Solidion Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Solidion Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. W.W. Grainger's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are larger than Solidion Technology quarterly revenues of --. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than Solidion Technology's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.14x while Solidion Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.78x versus -- for Solidion Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WESCO International has a net margin of 11.22% compared to W.W. Grainger's net margin of 3.01%. W.W. Grainger's return on equity of 52.75% beat WESCO International's return on equity of 14.43%.

W.W. Grainger has a consensus price target of $1,052.10, signalling upside risk potential of 8.12%. On the other hand WESCO International has an analysts' consensus of $223.95 which suggests that it could grow by 37.71%. Given that WESCO International has higher upside potential than W.W. Grainger, analysts believe WESCO International is more attractive than W.W. Grainger.

W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.178, which suggesting that the stock is 17.817% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WESCO International has a beta of 2.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.456%.

W.W. Grainger has a quarterly dividend of $2.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. WESCO International offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. W.W. Grainger pays 22.05% of its earnings as a dividend. WESCO International pays out 19.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

W.W. Grainger quarterly revenues are $4.2B, which are smaller than WESCO International quarterly revenues of $5.5B. W.W. Grainger's net income of $475M is higher than WESCO International's net income of $165.4M. Notably, W.W. Grainger's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.14x while WESCO International's PE ratio is 12.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for W.W. Grainger is 2.78x versus 0.38x for WESCO International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.